<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Comical Musings &#187; Greystone Inn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://luprand.com/tag/greystone-inn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://luprand.com</link>
	<description>Webcomic reviews and sundry shenanigans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:07:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Evil Inc.</title>
		<link>http://luprand.com/2009/08/review-evil-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://luprand.com/2009/08/review-evil-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luprand</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Guigar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dilbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evil Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greystone Inn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recycled art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spin-off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[villains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luprand.com/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since last week&#8217;s review involved a comic that seemed like the Internet&#8217;s answer to Calvin and Hobbes, perhaps I&#8217;ve been in a bit too much of a mood to compare webcomics to popular things in other media. It doesn&#8217;t work all that well, though, because sometimes there&#8217;s nothing to compare and sometimes there&#8217;s too much. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since last week&#8217;s review involved a comic that seemed like the Internet&#8217;s answer to <i>Calvin and Hobbes</i>, perhaps I&#8217;ve been in a bit too much of a mood to compare webcomics to popular things in other media. It doesn&#8217;t work all that well, though, because sometimes there&#8217;s nothing to compare and sometimes there&#8217;s too much. For example, if there&#8217;s anything in the older media that compares to <a href="http://luprand.com/2009/06/review-furthia-high/">Furthia High</a>, I&#8217;d rather not know about it. This week, however, there&#8217;s a bit too much to compare.</p>
<p>At first, it&#8217;s tempting to describe <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com"><i>Evil Inc.</i></a>, by Brad Guigar, as <i>Dilbert</i> with supervillains. After all, it&#8217;s set at a <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20050613.html">big corporation</a> and occasionally gives extra attention to <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20050829.html">a specific department</a> or <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20060403.html">the workers&#8217; union</a>. You even get the occasional jab at <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20050726.html">office misogyny</a> from a super&#8217;s perspective. In fact, at first gloss the only apparent difference from Scott Adams&#8217; oeuvre is that the art is considerably higher in quality and the plot lines are more complicated. (<a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20051115.html">This plotline</a> kinda resolves <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20060626.html">here</a>, but its effects are still apparent <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20070627.html">here</a> and may continue to dominate the comic plotline for some time yet).</p>
<p>Well, then the differences start to crop up. For one thing, you&#8217;ll notice that Guigar loves his <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20070714.html">call desk puns</a>. <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20060708.html">He</a> <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20050618.html">really</a> <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20051210.html">loves</a> <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20060204.html">him</a> <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20060419.html">some</a> <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20060722.html">call</a>-<a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20060513.html">center</a> <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20060617.html">comedy</a>. It doesn&#8217;t matter if there&#8217;s a plot in progress; if there&#8217;s a random pun to be made by Lightning Lady on a headset, the comic will be inserted. And if you take a good look at the comics I just linked to in this paragraph, you&#8217;ll notice that (with the exception of the Iron Dragon one) most of those panels do some heavy panel recycling.</p>
<p>Reusing panels for throwaway gags isn&#8217;t a terrible thing to do, but after a while it gets sort of grating (which I imagine call center work also does). Mostly, it&#8217;s disappointing. After all, Guigar does both dramatic and cartoony art well enough to transition smoothly from one to the other <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20050802.html">in one strip</a>. And once the color comics start, you get to see <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20080805.html">every curve</a> of &#8230; well, let&#8217;s just say that Guigar follows the example of <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20090324.html">comic book artists everywhere</a>. So while seeing repeats of Guigar&#8217;s art isn&#8217;t as bad as seeing the sort of thing that <a href="http://www.drunkduck.com/Powerup_Comics/">Powerup Comics</a> actively spoofs, it&#8217;s still a little let-down from someone whose fresh art is so <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20090630.html">appealing</a>.</p>
<p>The writing is heavy on the parody, as the above examples show. There are certainly enough <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ComicBookTropes">comic book cliches</a> to mock out there, and Guigar mines them for all they&#8217;re worth. But, as with most long-running plot-based comics out there, it starts to experiment with more <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20070814.html">serious</a> <a href="http://www.evil-comic.com/archive/20070831.html">fare</a>. This can be good <i>or</i> bad, depending on whether it adds maturity or detracts from the humor.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not until you get into the supplemental information that you find out that <i>Evil Inc.</i> is actually a spin-off from Guigar&#8217;s previous comic, <a href="http://www.greystoneinn.net/"><i>Greystone Inn</i></a>. Apparently Lightning Lady started with a minor role in that comic, then garnered enough attention to go for a solo career of sorts. In which csae, perhaps <i>Evil Inc.</i> isn&#8217;t so much <i>Dilbert</i> after all, but whether it&#8217;s a <i>Frasier</i> or a <i>Joanie Loves Chachi</i> is still up in the air.</p>
<p><b>Comic Rating:</b> Three and a half days he will <i><b>RUE!</b></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://luprand.com/2009/08/review-evil-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

