<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Comical Musings &#187; comic sans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://luprand.com/tag/comic-sans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://luprand.com</link>
	<description>Webcomic reviews and sundry shenanigans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:07:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Review: PartiallyClips</title>
		<link>http://luprand.com/2009/09/review-partiallyclips/</link>
		<comments>http://luprand.com/2009/09/review-partiallyclips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luprand</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clip art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic sans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gag-a-day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PartiallyClips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luprand.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Art and writing hold a tenuous balance in webcomics. The best writing on the Internet doesn&#8217;t do much good if it&#8217;s smudged over a page of pencil sketches done by a nine-year-old or squeezed into badly-hyphenated word balloons in eight point Arial. And all the pretty landscapes, curvaceous females, and other assorted eye candy to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art and writing hold a tenuous balance in webcomics. The best writing on the Internet doesn&#8217;t do much good if it&#8217;s smudged over a page of pencil sketches done by a nine-year-old or squeezed into badly-hyphenated word balloons in eight point Arial. And all the pretty landscapes, curvaceous females, and other assorted eye candy to come out of Photoshop can only support a lackluster plot and stale jokes for so long*. In fact, this is true in any medium where words and ideas are expressed; writing and presentation have just as delicate a balance in music, TV, video games, and theater.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s where <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com"><i>PartiallyClips</i></a>, by <a href="http://www.erfworld.com/">Robert T. Balder</a>, throws a wrench into the works. In other comics that I&#8217;ve reviewed, the art style is a major contributor to the quality of the comic: <a href="http://luprand.com/2009/06/review-weregeek/"><i>Weregeek</i></a>&#8216;s free-flowing lines help set a whimsical tone, while <a href="http://luprand.com/2009/06/review-awkward-zombie/">AWKWARD ZOMBIE</a>&#8216;s art is blockier and more stylized, lending well to its frequent use of exaggeration for comedy. But <i>PC</i> doesn&#8217;t really have an art style, because the comic itself is nothing but clip art. Other than the <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/about.php">rules</a> that Balder sets for how he uses the clip art, none of the visual portion of the comic is from his effort.</p>
<p>He even letters his work in <a href="http://bancomicsans.com/">Comic Sans</a>. It&#8217;s almost like he&#8217;s <i>daring</i> people to pay any attention to the art, other than as a backdrop to his writing.</p>
<p>So then what&#8217;s to be said about the writing? Well, from the <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1054">get-go</a>, <i>PC</i> demonstrates why &#8220;for grownups&#8221; is part of its subtitle. A lot of the humor is <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1067">pretty</a> <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1383">raunchy</a>, although it can be <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1086">quite</a> <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1132">subtle</a> about it at times. Other times, the phrase &#8220;<a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1456">ham-fisted</a>&#8221; seems both inadequate and somewhat unsettling in context.</p>
<p>A lot of the humor in <i>PC</i> comes from upending the reader&#8217;s expectations. A cheerful dollhouse is populated by <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1125">crazy dolls</a>. The legions of evil have <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1288">random drug tests</a>. Philosophy gets compared to <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1149">Mr. Roboto</a>. Accordion music turns out to be <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1294">even more sinister than you thought</a>. <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1412">Cute</a> <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1612">animals</a> <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1140">are</a> <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1309">not</a> <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1005">so</a> <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1093">innocent</a>. This brand of humor can get rather old, as you&#8217;ll recall from my review of <a href="http://luprand.com/2009/08/review-rob-and-elliot/"><i>Rob and Elliot</i></a>, although <i>PartiallyClips</i> tends to space it out a bit more.</p>
<p>Another seeming standby is to toss in a quick jab at religion. It probably doesn&#8217;t <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1341">seem</a> all that <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1164">frequent</a> unless you&#8217;re <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1563">archive</a>-<a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1463">binging</a> the way I <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1083">do</a> when I write these reviews, but it does stick out a bit. As for the man at church who so heartily recommended the comic, I&#8217;ll have to give him a good-natured joshing about it later.</p>
<p>So is <i>PartiallyClips</i> worth your time? It certainly can be. There were more than a handful of comics that I thought were funny enough to share (<a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1128">these</a> <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1266">three</a> <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/index.php?id=1015">comics</a>, for example), and the <a href="http://www.partiallyclips.com/archives.php">archive</a> page, while bloated from the comic&#8217;s near-decade of existence, is easy to search through. Just avoid reading it when the kids are home.</p>
<p><b>Comic Rating:</b> Three nearly-identical panels.</p>
<p>*<font size="-1">Yes, I&#8217;m aware that the &#8220;tits for hits&#8221; phenomenon is alive and well and probably the only reason <i>Sore Thumbs</i> continues to run, but I remain a purist.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://luprand.com/2009/09/review-partiallyclips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

